To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Medial Congruent vs Cruciate-Retaining Bearings in TKA: No Difference in Fixation at 2 Years

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2025

Medial Congruent vs Cruciate-Retaining Bearings in TKA: No Difference in Fixation at 2 Years

Vol: 307| Issue: 8| Number:66| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Does a medial congruent bearing in total knee arthroplasty compromise fixation? A randomized controlled trial.

Knee . 2025 Mar:53:19-27.

Contributing Authors:
KRL Mortensen LH Ingelsrud O Muharemovic K Gromov A Troelsen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty patients with osteoarthritis undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a medial congruent (MC) bearing (n=30) or a cruciate-retaining (CR) bearing (n=30). The primary outcome was tibial implant migration at 2 years, measured by maximal total point motion (MTPM) using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Secondary outcomes included other RSA migration/rotation...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue