LOGIN
Bioresorbable Scaffold-Anchor vs Standard Anchor in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears
March 2025
Bioresorbable Scaffold-Anchor vs Standard Anchor in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1
Interpositional Bioresorbable Scaffold-Anchor Appears Non-inferior to a Standard Anchor in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears.
Orthopedics. 2025 Jan-Feb;48(1):e33-e39.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Ninety-nine patients with full- or high-grade partial-thickness rotator cuff tears were randomized to receive either a novel interpositional bioresorbable scaffold-anchor (n=50) or a standard all-suture anchor (n=49) during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The primary outcome was the retear rate assessed via ultrasound at 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.