To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Mobile-based in-home telerehabilitation vs with in-hospital face-to-face rehabilitation post THA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2025

Mobile-based in-home telerehabilitation vs with in-hospital face-to-face rehabilitation post THA

Vol: 307| Issue: 3| Number:123| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Mobile-based in-home telerehabilitation compared with in-hospital face-to-face rehabilitation for elderly patients after total hip arthroplasty in China's level 1 trauma center: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.

Front Surg. 2025 Jan 14:11:1536579.

Contributing Authors:
Y Zhou Y Lyu Q Wang Y Ma L Huang X Zhang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty-one elderly patients with acute femoral neck fractures who underwent total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a mobile-based in-home telerehabilitation program (n=30) or standard in-hospital face-to-face physical therapy (n=31). The primary outcome was the hip-related quality of life (QOL) subscale of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at 12 weeks. Sec...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue