To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Effects of OMT Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Chronic Low Back Pain

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2025

Effects of OMT Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Chronic Low Back Pain

Vol: 307| Issue: 5| Number:25| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Clin Rehabil . 2024 Dec;38(12):1609-1621.

Contributing Authors:
D Armbrust GPT Areas CL Fonseca FZDS Areas NAC Duarte SAA Santana AJL Dumont HP Neto CS Oliveira

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seventy-two patients with chronic non-specific low back pain were randomized to receive active tDCS + OMT (n=24), sham tDCS + sham OMT (n=24), or sham tDCS + OMT (n=24). The primary outcome of interest was pain intensity measured using the Visual Analogue Scale. Secondary outcomes included disability (Roland-Morris Questionnaire), quality of life (EuroQoL 5-Dimension 3-Level), and adverse events. ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue