To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

All-Arthroscopic Technique vs Mosaicplasty for Deep Osteochondral Lesions of The Talus

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2025

All-Arthroscopic Technique vs Mosaicplasty for Deep Osteochondral Lesions of The Talus

Vol: 307| Issue: 3| Number:110| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Prospective comparison of two different surgical technique in the treatment of deep osteochondral lesions of the talus: mosaicplasty versus all-arthroscopic technique with scaffold and autograft bone taken from the tibial plafond.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 01-Dec;():. 10.1007/s00402-024-05673-z

Contributing Authors:
M Ozyildiran M Armangil EA Ozbek R Akmese

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Thirty patients with deep osteochondral lesions of the talus were randomized to receive either mosaicplasty (n=15) or an all-arthroscopic technique using scaffold and autograft bone from the tibial plafond (n=15). The primary outcome of interest was clinical improvement measured by the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score. Secondary outcomes included VAS pain scores and radiologic outcomes based on MOCART s...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue