To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

10Yr Follow-up of Bone Density in THA of a Porous Titanium Construct Shell vs. a Porous Coated Shell

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2025

10Yr Follow-up of Bone Density in THA of a Porous Titanium Construct Shell vs. a Porous Coated Shell

Vol: 307| Issue: 2| Number:27| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Long-term follow-up of bone density changes in total hip arthroplasty: comparative analysis from a randomized controlled trial of a porous titanium construct shell vs. a porous coated shell.

Int Orthop . 2024 Nov;48(11):2835-2842.

Contributing Authors:
M Axenhus M Salemyr S Mukka Olof Skoldenberg Martin Magneli

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Thirty-eight patients with primary osteoarthritis who had previously participated in a randomized controlled trial were followed for ten years to assess the long-term effects of a 3D porous titanium construct shell (PTC) versus a standard porous hydroxyapatite-coated titanium shell (PC) in total hip arthroplasty. Patients were randomized to receive either a PTC implant (n=18) or a PC implant (n=20...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue