To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparison of Proprioceptive Training & Modified Broström-Gould Surgery for Ankle Instability

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2025

Comparison of Proprioceptive Training & Modified Broström-Gould Surgery for Ankle Instability

Vol: 307| Issue: 1| Number:110| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison of Subjective and Biomechanical Outcomes Between Proprioceptive Training and Modified Broström-Gould Surgery for Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Sep 13;12(9):23259671241274138.

Contributing Authors:
Z Hou S Ren Y Hu C Jiao Q Guo N Li X Miao S Zhang D Jiang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Fifty-six patients with chronic ankle instability were randomized to receive either proprioceptive training (n=28) or modified Broström-Gould surgery (n=28). The primary outcome was the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sports subscale score. Secondary outcomes included biomechanical measures such as foot pressure during walking, center of pressure (COP) velocity, and time-to-boundary (TTB) du...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue