To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Higher rates of anatomical insertion of hamstring tendon regeneration post ACL reconstruction

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2025

Higher rates of anatomical insertion of hamstring tendon regeneration post ACL reconstruction

Vol: 307| Issue: 1| Number:68| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Higher rates of anatomical insertion of medial hamstring tendon regeneration post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with stump preservation graft harvesting technique: A prospective, randomised, double-blinded clinical trial with magnetic resonanc

J ISAKOS . 2024 Aug;9(4):575-580.

Contributing Authors:
CA Low SH Teo

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Thirty patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were randomized into two groups: stump preservation (n=14) or conventional graft harvesting (n=16). The primary outcome was the anatomical insertion of regenerated tendons. Secondary outcomes included rates of tendon regeneration, cross-sectional areas of regenerated tendons, and the proximal shift of the musculotendinous junction. Outcomes were assess...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue