To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Different Volumes of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block on Pain in Femoral Fracture Surgeries

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2024

Different Volumes of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block on Pain in Femoral Fracture Surgeries

Vol: 306| Issue: 12| Number:30| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Impact of Different Volumes of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block on Pain During Spinal Anesthesia Positioning and Postoperative Opioid Requirements in Femoral Fracture Surgeries; Randomized Prospective Study.

J Pain Res . 2024 Sep 18:17:3075-3084.

Contributing Authors:
G Ertaş H Şenol Çakmak S Akdeniz A Yurtbay E Polat Y Yigit N Sertöz S Tulgar

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty patients undergoing femoral fracture surgery were randomized to receive a PENG block with either 20 mL (n=30) or 30 mL (n=30) of local anesthetic. The primary outcome was pain during spinal anesthesia positioning, measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included postoperative NRS pain scores and cumulative opioid requirements within the first 24 hours. Quadriceps we...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue