To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Dry needling and spinal manipulative therapy vs spinal manipulative therapy alone for low back pain

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2024

Dry needling and spinal manipulative therapy vs spinal manipulative therapy alone for low back pain

Vol: 306| Issue: 12| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison of the effects of dry needling and spinal manipulative therapy versus spinal manipulative therapy alone on functional disability and endurance in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: An experimental study.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 01-Sep;():. 10.1097/MD.0000000000039734

Contributing Authors:
K Khan A Ahmad MA Mohseni Bandpei M Kashif

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred fourteen patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain were randomized to receive either dry needling combined with spinal manipulative therapy (n=57) or spinal manipulative therapy alone (n=57). The primary outcome of interest was functional disability, measured by the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included lumbar muscle endurance, assessed using the Sor...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue