To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Structural Diagnosis and Management vs MyoFascial Release for improving plantar heel pain

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2024

Structural Diagnosis and Management vs MyoFascial Release for improving plantar heel pain

Vol: 306| Issue: 12| Number:40| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison of Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) approach and MyoFascial Release (MFR) for improving plantar heel pain, ankle range of motion and disability: A randomized clinical trial.

J Man Manip Ther . 2024 Aug;32(4):368-377.

Contributing Authors:
S Akter MS Hossain KMA Hossain Z Uddin MA Hossain F Alom MF Kabir LM Walton V Raigangar

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty-four patients with plantar heel pain, plantar fasciitis, or calcaneal spur were randomized to receive either the Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) approach (n=32) or Myofascial Release (MFR) (n=32). Both groups also received common adjunct therapies, including strengthening exercises, ice compression, and ultrasound therapy. The primary outcomes of interest were pain, activity limita...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue