To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Lower Discharge times for Intravenous Anesthesia vs. Inhaled Anesthesia in Shoulder Arthroscopy RCT

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2024

Lower Discharge times for Intravenous Anesthesia vs. Inhaled Anesthesia in Shoulder Arthroscopy RCT

Vol: 306| Issue: 10| Number:20| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol Reduces Discharge Times Compared with Inhaled General Anesthesia in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2024 Jul 3;106(13):1154-1161.

Contributing Authors:
KJ Cablay LA Arney NJ Peterman AA Yu-Shan GL Smith A Kazemi JA Joseph JR Tuttle

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

96 patients scheduled for primary shoulder arthroscopy were randomized to receive total intravenous anesthesia with propofol (TIVA-P) (n=48) or inhaled general anesthesia (n=48). The primary outcome of interest was PACU-1 time (Aldrete score >=9). Secondary outcomes of interest included Surgical time, PACU-2 time, total time til discharge, pre and post-operative pain, use of postoperative antiemet...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue