To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Iontophoresis and Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis Pain

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2025

Iontophoresis and Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis Pain

Vol: 307| Issue: 3| Number:24| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison of the Short-Term Effect between Iontophoresis and Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;12(12):1223.

Contributing Authors:
M Pabon-Carrasco M Cohena-Jimenez AJ Perez-Belloso J Algaba-Del-Castillo R Caceres-Matos A Castro-Mendez

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred twenty-seven patients with chronic plantar fasciitis were randomized to receive iontophoresis therapy with lidocaine 0.4% and dexamethasone 0.5% (n=63) or radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT) (n=64). The primary outcome of interest was pain reduction measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included plantar fascia thickness assessed by ultrasound and ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue