To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Hemodynamic Changes In The Prone Position According to Fluid Loading After Anaesthesia Induction

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2025

Hemodynamic Changes In The Prone Position According to Fluid Loading After Anaesthesia Induction

Vol: 307| Issue: 2| Number:69| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Hemodynamic changes in the prone position according to fluid loading after anaesthesia induction in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a randomized, assessor-blind, prospective study.

Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2356645.

Contributing Authors:
S Lee DY Kim J Han K Kim AH You HY Kang SW Park MK Kim JE Kim JH Choi

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eighty patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery were randomized to receive either fluid maintenance (n=40) or fluid loading (n=40). Both groups received intravenous fluids at 2 ml/kg/h until surgical incision, while the fluid loading group received an additional 5 ml/kg over 10 minutes after anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension before surgical incisio...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue