To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block + Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block for Hip Arthroscopy

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2024

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block + Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block for Hip Arthroscopy

Vol: 306| Issue: 10| Number:8| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison of the Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Combined with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

J Pain Res . 2024 May 6:17:1651-1661.

Contributing Authors:
M Liu M Gao Y Hu X Ren Y Li F Gao J Dong Q Wang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eighty patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery were randomized to receive either a fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB; n=39) or a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block combined with a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block (n=39). The primary outcome of interest was the rate of quadriceps weakness after nerve block. Secondary outcomes included muscle strength grading, static and dyna...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue