To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Robot-Assisted vs. Manual Total Hip Arthroplasty: Accuracy, Limb Length Restoration, & Time

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2025

Robot-Assisted vs. Manual Total Hip Arthroplasty: Accuracy, Limb Length Restoration, & Time

Vol: 307| Issue: 3| Number:20| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

A new designed full process coverage robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized clinical trial.

Int J Surg. 2024 Jan 19;110(4):2141–2150.

Contributing Authors:
X Lu Z Zhang H Xu W Wang H Zhang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred forty-eight patients with end-stage hip diseases were randomized to receive either robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) (n=74) or manual total hip arthroplasty (MTHA) (n=74). The primary outcome of interest was the accuracy of implant placement, including acetabular and femoral prosthesis positioning. Secondary outcomes included operative time, femoral prosthesis filling rate...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue