LOGIN
COA 2024: Mechanically vs. Kinematically Aligned TKA - Evaluating Clinically Important Differences
June 2024
COA 2024: Mechanically vs. Kinematically Aligned TKA - Evaluating Clinically Important Differences
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1
Evaluating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Between Mechanically- and Kinematically-Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
Twelve studies with 1,033 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mechanically-aligned TKA vs. kinematically-aligned TKA. Pooled outcomes of interest included radiographic alignment, range of motion, and patient-reported outcome measures. The pooled results indicated no statistically significant differences in range of motion;...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.