To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Cervical Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis: A Meta-Analysis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2024

Cervical Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis: A Meta-Analysis

Vol: 306| Issue: 7| Number:3| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol . 2024 Mar-Apr;68(2):168-178.

Contributing Authors:
JH Nunez B Escudero JD Montenegro MJ Jimenez-Jiminez J Martinez-Pena M Surroca D Bosch-Garcia

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Thirteen randomized clinical trials including 2,963 patients with cervical degenerative disc disease were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cervical arthroplasty vs. anterior cervical arthrodesis. Pooled outcomes of interest included superior adjacent syndrome rate, reoperation rate, adverse event rate, radicular pain, neck disability index, and SF-36 physical and ment...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue