To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Robotic-Assisted Vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2024

Robotic-Assisted Vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Vol: 306| Issue: 7| Number:12| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol . 2024 Apr;34(3):1333-1343.

Contributing Authors:
R Alrajeb M Zarti Z Shuia O Alzobi G Ahmed A Elmhiregh

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seven randomized controlled trials including 1942 patients with primary osteoarthritis were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) vs. conventional total knee arthroplasty (CTKA). Pooled outcomes of interest included post-operative alignment, knee range of motion, knee society scores (clinical and functional), Hospital of Spec...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue