To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block For Postoperative Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2024

Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block For Postoperative Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Vol: 306| Issue: 6| Number:42| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Fascia iliaca compartment block for postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BMC Anesthesiol . 2024 Mar 9;24(1):95.

Contributing Authors:
MME Eshag LOM Hasan S Elshenawy MS Ahmed AE Emad Mostafa YA Abdelghafar YJ Althawadi NM Ibraheem H Badr YH AbdelQadir

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eight randomized controlled trials including 654 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) vs. placebo. Pooled outcomes of interest included pain intensity at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, total analgesic consumption, sensory block, nausea and vomiting, and muscle weakness. ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue