Non-Surgical Treatments for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Network Meta-Analysis
Non-Surgical Treatments for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Network Meta-Analysis
Comparison of non-surgical treatments for greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised studies
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
Nineteen randomized controlled trials including 1572 patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome were included in this systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing various treatments such as sham exercise, gluteal tendon loading, PRP injection, and corticosteroid injection. Pooled outcomes of interest included pain, function, and complications. The results indicated that sham exercis...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.