LOGIN
Novel Knee Replacement Design Vs Conventional Design on Functional Outcomes
May 2024
Novel Knee Replacement Design Vs Conventional Design on Functional Outcomes
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Assessment of improvement in functional outcomes between a novel knee replacement design and conventional designs in 240 knees: a randomized controlled trial
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
Two hundred forty patients with primary, Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4 knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either a novel TKR implant design (Persona CR, n=80) or one of two conventional TKR designs (PFC CR, n=80 and NexGen CR, n=80). The primary outcome of interest was the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Secondary outcomes included the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), the 15D, the UCLA activity sco...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.