LOGIN
Computerised Tomography-Based Planning With Conventional Vs Robotic-Arm Assisted THA
May 2024
Computerised Tomography-Based Planning With Conventional Vs Robotic-Arm Assisted THA
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing computerised tomography-based planning with conventional total hip arthroplasty versus robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
Sixty patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either conventional total hip arthroplasty (cTHA; n=30) or robotic-arm-assisted THA (rTHA; n=30). The primary outcome of interest was the reproducibility of the planned preoperative center of hip rotation. Secondary outcomes included the accuracy of acetabular cup orientation, restoration of offset, leg length discrepanc...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.