To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation vs Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defect

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2024

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation vs Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defect

Vol: 306| Issue: 11| Number:30| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Costal Chondrocyte-Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A 5-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Am J Sports Med . 2024 Feb;52(2):362-367. doi: 10.1177/03635465231222797.

Contributing Authors:
KH Yoon J Lee JY Park

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Twenty-five patients with knee articular cartilage defects were randomized to receive either CCP-ACI (n=16) or MFx (n=9). The primary outcome was the MOCART score, assessing cartilage repair via MRI. Secondary outcomes included the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Out...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue