To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2024

Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Vol: 306| Issue: 5| Number:58| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Robotic-assisted mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty does not lead to better clinical and radiological outcomes when compared to conventional TKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2023 Nov;31(11):4680-4691.

Contributing Authors:
A Bensa A Sangiorgio L Deabate A Illuminati B Pompa G Filardo

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

14 randomized controlled trials (2285 patients) comparing robot-assisted (R-TKA) versus conventional total knee arthroplasty (C-TKA) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of interest included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), hip-knee-ankle angle, tibial coronal angle (TCA), tibial sagittal angle (TSA), ope...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue