To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Curve-On-Curve Technique Doesn't Improve Tibial Coverage vs Tibial Tuberosity Technique in TKA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2025

Curve-On-Curve Technique Doesn't Improve Tibial Coverage vs Tibial Tuberosity Technique in TKA

Vol: 307| Issue: 6| Number:116| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Curve-on-curve technique does not improve tibial coverage in total knee arthroplasty in comparison to tibial tuberosity technique with use of anatomical implants: randomized controlled trial.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg . 2023 Sep;143(9):5901-5907.

Contributing Authors:
BM Maciag T Kordyaczny K Zarnovsky M Budzinska D Jegierski M Jegierski GJ Maciag A Stolarczyk

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eighty-eight patients with primary knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive total knee arthroplasty using the PERSONA PS anatomic implant via either the curve-on-curve technique (n=46) or the tibial tuberosity technique (n=42). The primary outcome of interest was tibial rotation angle. Secondary outcomes included tibial coverage, range of motion, maximum flexion, and extension. Outcomes were...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue