To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparison of PENG Block vs supra-inguinal fascia iliaca and lateral femoral cutaneous Block for THA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2025

Comparison of PENG Block vs supra-inguinal fascia iliaca and lateral femoral cutaneous Block for THA

Vol: 307| Issue: 2| Number:80| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

J Anesth. 2023 Aug;37(4):503-510.

Contributing Authors:
L Liang C Zhang W Dai K He

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Ninety-two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomized to receive either a PENG block with LFCN block (n=46) or an S-FICB (n=46), both using 30 mL of 0.33% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the time to first postoperative walk. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative remifentanil consumption, postoperative hip flexion degree, muscle strength of the operative lower limb, ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue