To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Closed- Versus Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2024

Closed- Versus Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis

Vol: 306| Issue: 1| Number:9| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Opening- and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy are comparable and early full weight bearing is safe with angular stable plate fixation: a meta-analysis.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2023 Jul;31(7):3015-3026.

Contributing Authors:
MH van Haeringen PPFM Kuijer JG Daams RCI van Geenen JM Brinkman GMMJ Kerkhoffs RJ van Heerwaarden A Hoorntje

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

10 + 3 randomized controlled trials (314 and 189 patients, respectively) that compared open-wedge high tibial osteotomy versus closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy and early- versus delayed-full-weight bearing (FWB), respectively, in patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Outcomes of interest included pain on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), normalized pain scale and activities of daily liv...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue