To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Pre-Operative Quantitative Pivot Shift Testing Correlation with Post ACL Reconstruction Kinematics

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2023

Pre-Operative Quantitative Pivot Shift Testing Correlation with Post ACL Reconstruction Kinematics

Vol: 303| Issue: 9| Number:9| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Preoperative quantitative pivot shift does not correlate with in vivo kinematics following ACL reconstruction with or without lateral extraarticular tenodesis.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2802-2809.

Contributing Authors:
CM Gibbs JD Hughes AJ Popchak D Chiba PW Winkler BP Lesniak WJ Anderst V Musahl

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

20 patients randomized to receive an ACL reconstruction alone or with a concomitant lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) procedure were assessed for pre-operative quantitative pivot shift (QPS) and post-operative knee kinematics. The correlation between QPS and knee kinematics was calculated to assess the potential of QPS for informing treatment decision-making, and whether an ACL reconstruction...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue