To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Migration & Clinical Outcomes with Triple-Taper Blade vs. Quadrangular-Taper Femoral Stem in THA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2023

Migration & Clinical Outcomes with Triple-Taper Blade vs. Quadrangular-Taper Femoral Stem in THA

Vol: 303| Issue: 8| Number:28| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

2-Year Radiostereometric Analysis Evaluation of a Short, Proximally Coated, Triple-Taper Blade Femoral Stem Versus a Quadrangular-Taper Stem With Reinforced Proximal Body: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7S):S152-S161.

Contributing Authors:
A Fontalis B Kayani I Vanhegan J Tahmassebi IC Haddad DE Giebaly V Rajput S Hansjee FS Haddad

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive a cementless femoral stem implant using a proximally coated, triple-taper short blade stem (T-stem; n=30) or a quadrangular-taper femoral stem with a reinforced proximal body (POLARSTEM; n=30). The outcomes of interest included migration measured via radiostereometric analysis (RSA), Oxford Hip Scores (OHS), Harris Hip S...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue