To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Tele-rehabilitation Vs. Clinic-Based Exercise For Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2023

Tele-rehabilitation Vs. Clinic-Based Exercise For Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Vol: 303| Issue: 7| Number:25| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

In non-specific low back pain, is an exercise program carried out through telerehabilitation as effective as one carried out in a physiotherapy center? A controlled randomized trial.

Musculoskelet Sci Pract . 2023 Jun;65:102765.

Contributing Authors:
FJ Villatoro-Luque D Rodriguez-Almagro A Aibar-Almazan S Fernandez-Carnero D Pecos-Martin AJ Ibanez-Vera A Achalandabaso-Ochoa

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seventy-eight patients with non-specific low back pain were randomized to receive either an exercise program via telerehabilitation (TLRH; n=39) or a clinic-based exercise program (CG; n=39). Outcomes of interest included low back pain intensity measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and hip strength during flexion and extension ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue