LOGIN
Real vs. Sham C0-C1 Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain and Upper Cervical Restriction
March 2023
Real vs. Sham C0-C1 Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain and Upper Cervical Restriction
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1
Are there differences between a real C0-C1 mobilization and a sham technique in function and pressure pain threshold in patients with chronic neck pain and upper cervical restriction? A randomised controlled clinical trial.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(1): 61-70.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Twenty-eight patients with chronic neck pain and upper cervical restriction were randomized to receive a single session of C0-C1 dorsal gliding manual therapy (n=14) or a sham treatment (n=14). The primary outcome of interest was the flexion-rotation test variable. Secondary outcomes included upper flexion-extension mobility, pain pressure threshold, and deep flexor muscle activation, measured imm...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.