To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Manipulation vs. Cervical Traction for Radical Cervical Spondylosis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2022

Manipulation vs. Cervical Traction for Radical Cervical Spondylosis

Vol: 302| Issue: 4| Number:11| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Evaluation of the Efficacy of Manipulation and Cervical Traction in the Treatment of Radical Cervical Spondylosis

Emerg Med Int. 2022 Oct 6;2022:3837995.

Contributing Authors:
J Chen R Chen Y Li M Chen Z Lv H Zeng Q Lian

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eleven randomized trials with a total of 994 radical cervical spondylosis patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing manipulation (n=525) and cervical traction (n=469). The primary outcome of interest was short-term efficacy (as determined by Chinese medicine literature standards). Secondary outcomes of interest included the improvement from baseline in Visual Ana...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue