To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.


Already Have an Account?

Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Vol:261 Issue:1 Number:3 ISSN#:2564-2537
ACE Report #14739
Ace Report Cover Shoulder & Elbow

3 Year Clinical Evaluation of Arthroscopic vs. Open Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis

How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. 3 Year Clinical Evaluation of Arthroscopic vs. Open Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis. ACE Report. 2022;261(1):3. Available from:

Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

No Difference in Clinical Outcomes for Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis at Midterm Follow-up: A Randomized Prospective Analysis

Am J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6): 1486-1494.

Contributing Authors:
B Forsythe EJ Berlinberg CC Diaz A Korrapati A Agarwalla HH Patel BJ Cole GL Cvetanovich AB Yanke AA Romeo NN Verma

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here


Eighty-five patients with a long head of the biceps tendon pathology were randomized to receive open (n=43) or arthroscopic (n=42) suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. Outcomes of interest included patient-reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] Constant score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE]). This was a mid term follow up study, with an average follow-up time of...

Ace Report Preview Image
CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

For Reprints and Permissions, click here

Please Login or Join to leave comments.