3 Year Clinical Evaluation of Arthroscopic vs. Open Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis
No Difference in Clinical Outcomes for Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis at Midterm Follow-up: A Randomized Prospective AnalysisAm J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6): 1486-1494.
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Eighty-five patients with a long head of the biceps tendon pathology were randomized to receive open (n=43) or arthroscopic (n=42) suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. Outcomes of interest included patient-reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] Constant score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE]). This was a mid term follow up study, with an average follow-up time of...
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.Continue