To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

3 Year Clinical Evaluation of Arthroscopic vs. Open Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2022

3 Year Clinical Evaluation of Arthroscopic vs. Open Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis

Vol: 261| Issue: 1| Number:3| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

No Difference in Clinical Outcomes for Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis at Midterm Follow-up: A Randomized Prospective Analysis

Am J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6): 1486-1494.

Contributing Authors:
B Forsythe EJ Berlinberg CC Diaz A Korrapati A Agarwalla HH Patel BJ Cole GL Cvetanovich AB Yanke AA Romeo NN Verma

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eighty-five patients with a long head of the biceps tendon pathology were randomized to receive open (n=43) or arthroscopic (n=42) suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. Outcomes of interest included patient-reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] Constant score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE]). This was a mid term follow up study, with an average follow-up time of...

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.