To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy & Platelet Rich Plasma Injection vs. Tenotomy Alone for Tendinosis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2022

Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy & Platelet Rich Plasma Injection vs. Tenotomy Alone for Tendinosis

Vol: 181| Issue: 1| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle tenotomy (PNT) alone versus PNT plus platelet-rich plasma injection for the treatment of chronic tendinosis: A randomized controlled trial.

PM R. 2021 Dec;13(12): 1340-1349.

Contributing Authors:
JS Kirschner J Cheng N Hurwitz K Santiago E Lin N Beatty D Kingsbury I Wendel C Milani

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Forty patients with chronic tendinosis were randomized to receive a percutaneous needle tenotomy with a leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma (LR-PRP) injection (n=21) or percutaneous needle tenotomy alone (n=19). Outcomes of interest included current pain, average pain, function, general well-being, and sleep quality, measured using 10-point scales. Outcomes were assessed up to 104 weeks post-treat...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue