To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Subchondral Drilling, Peripheral Blood Stem Cells and HA for Chondral Defects of the Knee

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2021

Subchondral Drilling, Peripheral Blood Stem Cells and HA for Chondral Defects of the Knee

Vol: 125| Issue: 1| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Arthroscopic Subchondral Drilling Followed by Injection of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells and Hyaluronic Acid Showed Improved Outcome Compared to Hyaluronic Acid and Physiotherapy for Massive Knee Chondral Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Arthroscopy . 2021 Aug;37(8):2502-2517.

Contributing Authors:
KY Saw AW Anz RC Ng CS Jee SF Low C Dorvault KB Johnson

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred and twenty patients with massive subchondral knee defects were randomized to the intervention group undergoing arthroscopic subchondral drilling followed by peripheral blood stem cell and hyaluronic acid injections (n=60) or a control group receiving hyaluronic acid injections and physiotherapy (n=60). The coprimary endpoints were the subjective International Knee Documentation Committ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue