To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation vs. Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2021

Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation vs. Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Vol: 104| Issue: 1| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

No difference in clinical outcomes between portable navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A randomised trial.

ANZ J Surg. 2021 Sep;91(9): 1914-1918.

Contributing Authors:
SF Ali MA Gharaibeh JA Wood DB Chen SJ Macdessi

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred and eighty-four patients with degenerative knee osteoarthritis were randomized to undergo a unilateral total knee arthroplasty procedure using a portable accelerometer-based navigation device (n=95) or conventional instrumentation (n=89). The primary outcome of interest was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Secondary outcomes of interest included the KOOS subscal...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue