LOGIN
Ultra-Short vs. Conventional Cementless Femoral Stem: Long-Term Outcomes
March 2025
Ultra-Short vs. Conventional Cementless Femoral Stem: Long-Term Outcomes
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of the Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Results of an Ultra-Short vs a Conventional Length Cementless Anatomic Femoral Stem
J Arthroplasty. 2021 May;36(5):1707-1713.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
One thousand five hundred eighteen patients (1716 hips) with end-stage hip disease were randomized to receive either an ultra-short cementless anatomic femoral stem (n=759, 858 hips) or a conventional length cementless anatomic femoral stem (n=759, 858 hips). The primary outcome of interest was the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.