Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Volume:69 Issue:1 Number:2 ISSN#:2564-2537
ACE Report #13803
Ace Report Cover Physical Therapy & Rehab

Believability of Sham Neural Mobilization vs Real Neural Mobilization in Low Back Pain Patients

How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. Believability of Sham Neural Mobilization vs Real Neural Mobilization in Low Back Pain Patients. ACE Report. 2021;69(1):2. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/13803

Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Validation of a sham novel neural mobilization technique in patients with non-specific low back pain: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Jun;53: 102378

Contributing Authors: AC González SB Berenguer JM Luque Mañas A Martin-Pintado-Zugasti

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here


Fifty-four patients with subacute, non-specific low back pain (LBP) were randomized to receive a novel sham neural mobilization (NM) technique (n=26) or real NM (n=28). The primary outcome of interest was believability of the sham technique by asking patients 1 week post-treatment which intervention they believed they had received. The secondary outcome of interest was pain on the visual analogue ...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

For Reprints and Permissions, click here

Please Login or Join to leave comments.