Believability of Sham Neural Mobilization vs Real Neural Mobilization in Low Back Pain Patients
Believability of Sham Neural Mobilization vs Real Neural Mobilization in Low Back Pain Patients
Validation of a sham novel neural mobilization technique in patients with non-specific low back pain: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Jun;53: 102378Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Fifty-four patients with subacute, non-specific low back pain (LBP) were randomized to receive a novel sham neural mobilization (NM) technique (n=26) or real NM (n=28). The primary outcome of interest was believability of the sham technique by asking patients 1 week post-treatment which intervention they believed they had received. The secondary outcome of interest was pain on the visual analogue ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.