To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Epidural Ropivacaine With vs Without Dexmedetomidine After Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2021

Epidural Ropivacaine With vs Without Dexmedetomidine After Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation

Vol: 64| Issue: 1| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study

Asian Spine J. 2021 Jun;15(3): 324-332.

Contributing Authors:
F Qureshi SC Meena V Kumar K Jain R Chauhan A Luthra

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty patients undergoing a thoracolumbar spine instrumentation procedure were randomized to receive epidural ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (n=30) or epidural ropivacaine alone (n=30) through an epidural catheter. Outcomes of interest included rescue analgesia consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, patient satisfaction scores, time spent in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and in the ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue