To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Health-Related Quality of Life: X-Bolt vs. Sliding Hip Screw for Trochanteric Hip Fractures

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2025

Health-Related Quality of Life: X-Bolt vs. Sliding Hip Screw for Trochanteric Hip Fractures

Vol: 307| Issue: 3| Number:14| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Effect on health-related quality of life of the X-Bolt dynamic plating system versus the sliding hip screw for the fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip in adults: the WHiTE Four randomized clinical trial

Bone Joint J. 2021 Feb;103-B(2):256-263.

Contributing Authors:
XL Griffin J Achten HM O'Connor JA Cook ML Costa

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One thousand one hundred twenty-eight (1,128) patients aged 60 years and older with trochanteric hip fractures were randomized to receive either the X-Bolt Hip System (XHS) (n=564) or the sliding hip screw (SHS) (n=564). The primary outcome of interest was the EQ-5D-5L utility score at four months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included EQ-5D-5L at 12 months, mortality, residential status, mobil...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue