To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Isostretching Exercise for Chronic LBP Improves Pain, Function, Satisfaction & Lowers Analgesic Use

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2021

Isostretching Exercise for Chronic LBP Improves Pain, Function, Satisfaction & Lowers Analgesic Use

Vol: 15| Issue: 1| Number:5| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Influence of isostretching on patients with chronic low back pain. A randomized controlled trial

Physiother Theory Pract . 2021 Feb;37(2):287-294

Contributing Authors:
ERA Prado SM Meireles ACA Carvalho MF Mazoca AM Motta Neto R Barboza Da Silva EM Trindade Filho I Lombardi Júnior J Natour

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Fifty-four patients diagnosed with chronic low back pain were randomized to undergo an isostretching exercise program or a control group (no treatment; waiting listed for physical therapy). Primary outcomes of interest included pain and function were measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), respectively. Additional outcomes included ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue