Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Volume:9 Issue:12 Number:31 ISSN#:2563-5476
Author Verified
RCT
ACE Report #12744
Ace Report Cover Arthroplasty

Anatomical Knee Alignment Favourable with Robotic-Assisted bi-UKA vs TKA in OA Patients at 3 Months


How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. Anatomical Knee Alignment Favourable with Robotic-Assisted bi-UKA vs TKA in OA Patients at 3 Months. ACE Report. 2020;9(12):31. Available from: https://myorthoevidene.com/AceReport/Report/12744

Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Bone Joint J. 2020 Nov;102-B(11):1511-1518.

Contributing Authors: MS Banger WD Johnston N Razii J Doonan PJ Rowe BG Jones AD MacLean MJG Blyth

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eighty patients with bi-compartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) were randomized to receive a robotic-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) (n=42) or a traditional, mechanically-aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (n=38). The outcomes of interest included component positioning and anatomy of the knee joint (femoral and tibial coronal and sagittal angles, femoral and tibial axial ...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE