To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No Clinical Advantage of Sublingual Sufentanil vs Oral Oxycodone for Pain Management After TKA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2020

No Clinical Advantage of Sublingual Sufentanil vs Oral Oxycodone for Pain Management After TKA

Vol: 9| Issue: 12| Number:24| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Sufentanil sublingual tablet system versus oral oxycodone for management of postoperative pain in enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study.

J Exp Orthop. 2020 Dec; 7: 92.

Contributing Authors:
E Noel L Miglionico M Leclercq H Jennart JF Fils N Van Rompaey

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seventy-two patients scheduled for a unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive a sublingual sufentanil tablet system (15mcg) or oral oxycodone for post-operative pain management, in addition to a standardized multimodal analgesia protocol. The primary outcome of interest was pain on a numeric rating scale (NRS) at 24 hours post-operation. Secondary outcomes of interest included...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue