To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

OTA 2020: Investigating Predictive Factors of Revision Surgery - Secondary Analysis of HEALTH Trial

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2020

OTA 2020: Investigating Predictive Factors of Revision Surgery - Secondary Analysis of HEALTH Trial

Vol: 9| Issue: 10| Number:30| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:N/A
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

What Factors Increase Revision Surgery Risk When Treating Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures with Arthroplasty: A Secondary Analysis of the HEALTH Trial

Contributing Authors:
E Schemitsch S Bzovsky RW Poolman F Frihagen D Axelrod D Heels-Ansdell M Bhandari S Sprague PC Schottel The HEALTH Investigators M Blankstein

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Of a total of 1441 participants with low-energy displaced femoral neck fractures in the HEALTH trial, 117 patients who required revision surgery within 24 months of sustaining a fracture were included in this secondary analysis. This analysis investigated surgical and patient predictive factors for the need of revision. Factors of interest included age, body mass index (BMI), major comorbidities, ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue