To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Mepilex Wound Dressing Provides Greater Wound Management and Satisfaction vs Aquacel Wound Dressing

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2020

Mepilex Wound Dressing Provides Greater Wound Management and Satisfaction vs Aquacel Wound Dressing

Vol: 9| Issue: 10| Number:8| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

A prospective randomized controlled clinical investigation comparing two post-operative wound dressings used after elective hip and knee replacement; Mepilex® Border Post-Op versus Aquacel® surgical.

Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs.2020 Aug;38:100772.

Contributing Authors:
H Beele P Van Overschelde C Olivecrona S Smet

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred and thirteen patients who had undergone an elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive the Mepilex Border Post-Op wound dressing or the Aquacel Surgical wound dressing. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of wound dressing failure. Secondary outcomes of interest included the following: incidence of adverse events, incidence of investigator satisfa...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue