To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Low-Molecular Weight Heparin and Aspirin Provide Similar VTE Prevention in Trauma Fracture Patients

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2020

Low-Molecular Weight Heparin and Aspirin Provide Similar VTE Prevention in Trauma Fracture Patients

Vol: 9| Issue: 9| Number:8| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in orthopaedic trauma patients: A patient-centered randomized controlled trial.

PloS one. 2020 Aug 3;15(8):e0235628

Contributing Authors:
BE Haac NN O'Hara TT Manson GP Slobogean RC Castillo RV O'Toole DM Stein Investigators ADAPT

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Three hundred and twenty-nine patients with a traumatic extremity fracture requiring operative treatment where venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was needed were randomized to receive either low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or aspirin. The primary outcome of interest included the incidence of mortality, bleeding, venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep surgical site infection, and a combination of t...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue