To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar clinical outcomes with McKenzie method and motor control exercises for chronic low back pain

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2020

Similar clinical outcomes with McKenzie method and motor control exercises for chronic low back pain

Vol: 9| Issue: 1| Number:28| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

A randomized clinical trial comparing the McKenzie method and motor control exercises in people with chronic low back pain and a directional preference: 1-year follow-up

Physiotherapy. 2019 Dec;105(4):442-445.

Contributing Authors:
MH Halliday E Pappas MJ Hancock HA Clare RZ Pinto G Robertson PH Ferreira

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Fifty-eight patients completed the 1-year follow up in a randomized study comparing the McKenzie method vs. motor control exercises for the treatment of chronic low back pain. The primary outcome of interest was the change in trunk muscle thickness of the transversus abdominis, obliquus internus and obliquus externus muscles. Secondary outcomes of interest included the patient specific functional ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue