To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Reduced dysphagia with intravenous corticosteroid vs. placebo in anterior cervical spine procedures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2020

Reduced dysphagia with intravenous corticosteroid vs. placebo in anterior cervical spine procedures

Vol: 9| Issue: 1| Number:7| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

The Effects of Perioperative Corticosteroids on Dysphagia Following Surgical Procedures Involving the Anterior Cervical Spine: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 101(22):2007–2014, NOVEMBER 20, 2019

Contributing Authors:
S Cui SD Daffner JC France SE Emery

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

74 patients scheduled for an anterior cervical spine procedure were randomized to receive systemic peri-operative corticosteroids or normal saline for the treatment of dysphagia. The primary outcome of the change in swallowing was measured with the Bazaz scale and the Dysphagia Short Questionnaire (DSQ). Additional outcomes of interest included the Quality of Life 12, Neck Disability Index and sur...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue