To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Short term weight-bearing favourable with suprapatellar vs. intrapatellar approach in tibial nailing

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2019

Short term weight-bearing favourable with suprapatellar vs. intrapatellar approach in tibial nailing

Vol: 8| Issue: 10| Number:9| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Tibial nailing using a suprapatellar rather than an infrapatellar approach significantly reduces anterior knee pain postoperatively: a multicentre clinical trial

Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1138-1143

Contributing Authors:
DRW MacDonald P Caba-Doussoux CA Carnegie I Escriba DP Forward M Graf AJ Johnstone

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Ninety-four patients with tibial fractures scheduled for an intramedullary nail fixation procedure were randomized to receive the procedure via a suprapatellar approach or infrapatellar approach. The primary outcome of interest was weightbearing ratio between the injured/uninjured limb as measured by the Aberdeen Weight-bearing Test for the Knee (AWT-K). Secondary outcomes of interest included the...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue